<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Sophie</title>
  <link>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Sophie - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:31:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>sophie</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/59119.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Skype - and why I&apos;m not going to be using it any more</title>
  <link>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/59119.html</link>
  <description>If you use Skype, you may have noticed the number of people online on your contacts list dwindling a little lately.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I myself was signed out of Skype last night. I can no longer log in; my old version of Skype, 5.10, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.skype.com/2014/06/20/making-way-for-the-next-generation-of-skype-on-desktop/&quot;&gt;is now considered to be too old&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can&apos;t say I&apos;m *entirely* surprised about this; I was given ample warning that this would happen, and I just didn&apos;t heed it because the older version still worked long past the cutoff dates given to me. Unfortunately, this has left me with the problem of how to tell everybody that I&apos;m probably not going to be using it any more. This is a shame, because I actually used it quite a lot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why will I not be using it any more? Why can&apos;t I just update to the newest version?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, for some people the answer will be that they&apos;re still using Windows XP, which the newer versions of Skype don&apos;t support. That&apos;s not the case for me, but if you know that a contact of yours has Windows XP and you haven&apos;t heard from them for a bit, that may be why.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But no, the thing for me is that I&apos;ve been hearing a lot about how Skype is connected to the NSA. I probably don&apos;t need to explain why this is a bad thing, but it&apos;s possible some people reading this may not realise that the NSA collects data about you in bulk, including recording audio of phone calls, recording IMs, web sites you visit, and a lot of other things. Recently news came out that &lt;a href=&quot;http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/NSA-targets-the-privacy-conscious,nsa230.html&quot;&gt;they were targetting the privacy-conscious&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To put it lightly, the NSA are violating your privacy quite deliberately and knowingly - even if you live in the US. (The NSA&apos;s states that it only applies data gathering to foreign countries, but I&apos;m willing to bet that there are sites you visit that aren&apos;t sited in the US. Same applies if you live outside of the US and thought you were safe; if you use sites sited in the US (note: Dreamwidth is such a site), then the NSA is interested in you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The NSA also lies about how much data is collected. It was thought that the NSA &quot;only&quot; recorded metadata about phone calls such as time/date, phone numbers of each party, etc. Turns out that&apos;s untrue; apparently, &lt;a href=&quot;http://rt.com/news/172284-nsa-stores-calls-audio/&quot;&gt;&quot;At least 80 percent of all audio calls, not just metadata, are recorded and stored in the US&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. I am a little doubtful about that figure (and there is no evidence for this, unlike with Edward Snowden&apos;s leaked files), but if the figure is off then it probably isn&apos;t off by much. Even if the figure was 60%, that&apos;s still a frighteningly large amount.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I see no reason to believe that Skype is exempt from this, especially as there are news stories about &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/05/encrypted-or-not-skype-communications-prove-vital-to-nsa-surveillance/&quot;&gt;Skype being connected to the NSA&lt;/a&gt;. (The linked article is just one such article.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also found out today that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2013/08/15/windows-8-1-ships-with-skype-pre-installed/&quot;&gt;Skype comes pre-installed with Windows 8.1&lt;/a&gt;, which follows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2013/02/15/microsoft-begins-wider-messenger-shutdown-on-april-8th/&quot;&gt;their phase-out of Windows Live Messenger (also known by many as MSN Messenger)&lt;/a&gt;. This makes Skype an &lt;em&gt;incredibly&lt;/em&gt; attractive target for not just the NSA but also for hacking/cracking groups. Mostly the NSA, though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what is someone to do? I believe I can no longer use Skype as a permanent solution. Note that using an alternative Skype client will not solve the problem; any recording of data would be server-side, so it really doesn&apos;t matter what client you use to connect to it. (Not that Skype has exactly had the best of compatibility with third-party clients anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does anyone have any ideas?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sophie&amp;ditemid=59119&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/59119.html</comments>
  <category>nsa</category>
  <category>request for comments</category>
  <category>internet</category>
  <category>skype</category>
  <category>privacy</category>
  <category>link</category>
  <category>big posts</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>9</lj:reply-count>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/6187.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>The possible demise of Skype?</title>
  <link>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/6187.html</link>
  <description>Apparently, eBay, who owns the Skype VoIP network, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/technology/biz-tech/shock-threat-to-shut-skype-20090731-e3qe.html&quot;&gt;may have to shut down Skype&lt;/a&gt;. This has some rather interesting implications, since, well, Skype is huge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(7 days!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sophie&amp;ditemid=6187&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/6187.html</comments>
  <category>short posts</category>
  <category>skype</category>
  <category>link</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
