<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Sophie</title>
  <link>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Sophie - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:14:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>sophie</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/44432.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Twitter and identi.ca</title>
  <link>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/44432.html</link>
  <description>I&apos;m thinking of leaving Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&apos;s mainly because they force that damn t.co URL shortener on all links posted via the service. They don&apos;t do this for user convenience, because they even apply it to links that are already shortened by bit.ly or similar. No, they&apos;re doing it for analytics; they want to know what people are clicking on. And I&apos;m damned if I&apos;m going to give them that information. I wrote a Greasemonkey userscript that prevents my browser from going to t.co URLs that I click on the Twitter site, but it seems they still have some analytics that run when you click a link, separate from the t.co shortening. I still need to disable that, too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(And yes, I know that I already give Google that information when I click on a result on searches. Or rather, I did; I just looked and found that it&apos;s trivial to stop the URL mangling that Google does when you click on a link, so I just wrote a Greasemonkey script to stop that, too. This also gives me the advantage that I will no longer bombard anybody with long Google URLs when I right-click a link in the results and copy it to my clipboard. But anyway, this is kinda beside the point.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would use &lt;a href=&quot;https://identi.ca/&quot;&gt;https://identi.ca/&lt;/a&gt; , but their &lt;a href=&quot;https://identi.ca/doc/tos&quot;&gt;Terms of Service&lt;/a&gt; state:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;By submitting Content to Operator for inclusion on your Website, you grant all readers the right to use, re-use, modify and/or re-distribute the Content under the terms of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/&quot;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution 3.0&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wouldn&apos;t have a problem with this if &quot;Content&quot; just meant the text, but if you look to see the definition of &quot;Content&quot;, you find that it means anything covered by the action of &quot;[making] (or [allowing] any third party to make) material available by means of the Website&quot;. In other words, if you link to a photo/fanfic/tune/etc. of yours via the site, whatever you submitted is then (assuming you have the rights to do so) released under the CC-BY license, because you made it available by means of the site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can&apos;t agree to that. If I submit any creative works to identi.ca, I don&apos;t to want to be forced to release it under a CC-BY license. So, I haven&apos;t signed up for it, much as I want to move away from Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the way, the ToS are not shown to you during registration, or at least not on the first step. You do get a checkbox that you have to select to move forward, labelled &quot;My text and files are available under &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/&quot;&gt;Creative Commons Attribution 3.0&lt;/a&gt; except this private data: password, email address, IM address, and phone number.&quot;, but no direct link to the ToS. This makes it even worse; legally, there&apos;s nothing there to stop someone from interpreting it as &quot;All your files are licensed under CC-BY, even if you didn&apos;t submit them to the site&quot;. Obviously, if it came to that then this would be legally unenforceable (and of course it&apos;s not what identi.ca are talking about anyway), but still, I have a mistrust of the legal system to get things right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&apos;s a shame that Twitter are driving me away, because I really like the service. &amp;gt;_&amp;lt; And identi.ca is the only alternative I know that&apos;s even remotely popular compared to Twitter...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sophie&amp;ditemid=44432&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sophie.dreamwidth.org/44432.html</comments>
  <category>identi.ca</category>
  <category>rants</category>
  <category>twitter</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>6</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
