Sophie - Google News Archive is dead :(
browse
my journal
February 2020
 

Date: 2011-08-23 12:21
Security: Public
xposthttp://soph.livejournal.com/222853.html
Tags:archives, google, history
Subject: Google News Archive is dead :(

There's been a Google product of mine that I *really* love, and that's Google News Archive. It's been a very, very rich source of history for me, as the newspapers that it digitised and allowed you to browse went back quite some way - often back into the late 1800s, or even further back. This is a significant amount of history we're talking about here, and consists of many, many, many accounts of current events of the time. It was an absolute treasure trove of information.

Take, for example, the Columbian Herald. Here's a (low resolution, so that I don't get sued for copyright violations) screenshot of the issue on 28th August 1738: (click the screenshot to get a bigger picture, although not so big that you'll be able to make out the body text - again, that's to prevent any issues on copyright violation)

A screenshot of the Google News Archive interface showing three and a half digitised images of pages from the Columbian Herald from 28th August, 1738. The newspaper advertises itself on the first page as the 'INDEPENDENT COURIER of NORTH-AMERICA'. While the main body text cannot be made out, the titles and headings can, and on the first page they consist of various sales of land, and one heading on the first page even advertises 'Ten negroes'. The letter 's' in those times looked like the letter 'f' nowadays but without the stroke in the middle, making the word 're-sold' look like 're-fold', for example. The second and third pages seem mostly to be taken up by two or three articles (but only the heading for the first one, 'HINTS', is big enough to read), with the whole page divided up into four columns rather than the 'box' design of newspapers today. The second half of the third page is taken up by more trade advertisements, while on the fourth page, of which only half can be seen, a 'POETRY' section is visible as well as a 'Proclamation' and 'NOTICE'. None of the body text is large enough to be readable.

Now, the newspapers can still be read. For example, this newspaper issue can be seen by going to http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=IEpB_1CIIT4C&dat=17380828&printsec=frontpage&hl=en . (I doubt that this link will be suitable for screenreaders, as the Archive seems to present digitised images rather than text.) And you can still browse the newspapers by clicking "Browse all newspapers" at the top. However, you can't *search* the newspapers any more, and this was by far the Archive's greatest strength. You used to be able to search the Archive and get back not only the articles matched, but also a very nice little bar graph showing the frequency of the search term by date, and you could click on the graph to narrow the search down to a specific time period.

This made it incredibly useful for research or even just killing time. By searching the Archive you could gain an incredibly detailed view of how things were during a specific time period by looking at different newspapers. I spent many an hour buried in the Archive, because it was just so fascinating to me. Archives are a deep personal interest of mine, and suddenly being denied access to searching this one is heartbreaking, and it worries me because who knows if the archive itself will remain accessible?

I really hope Google can reconsider on this one.

[edited 2014-01-09 to fix the URL to the newspaper; apparently news.google.co.uk doesn't work for that URL any more, but news.google.com does.]

Post A Comment | 5 Comments | Add to Memories | Tell Someone | Link



User: [personal profile] feathertail
Date: 2011-08-23 16:03 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

I'm pretty sure copyright law doesn't cover stuff that's over 200 years old. On the other hand, I can see why Google would just have it work that way for everything.

Anyway, to me this says a) Newspaper owners and "copyright holders" are often jerks, and b) A service as valuable as this shouldn't be dependent on Google's whims. Sorry about this. ._.b

Reply | Thread | Link

Sophie
User: [personal profile] sophie
Date: 2011-08-23 16:08 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Oh, the zooming was totally my choice. The Archive lets you zoom in to pretty much any size you want; I had chosen to do it at this zoom for copyright reasons and to show an overview of the paper, though yeah, you're probably right that there isn't any copyrightable material in here any more.

I actually don't know why the service is being removed, if it's a copyright thing or what. I need to look into it more.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

User: [personal profile] feathertail
Date: 2011-08-23 16:15 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

I know, I was speculating there. >.>b Good luck.

Reply | Parent | Link

Rax E. Dillon: interrupting rax
User: [personal profile] rax
Date: 2011-08-23 16:16 (UTC)
Userpic:interrupting rax
Subject: (no subject)

One can copyright a specific presentation of information, at least in the US. So when I wanted to reprint some tidbits from the 1897 Boston Globe in a zine, I specifically couldn't use the images available online; I had to copy them out manually and re-typeset them so that I was not using their presentation. I'm not sure if that applies here (or in the UK, though I suspect the law is similar) but you are not crazy to be paranoid about it.

Reply | Parent | Link

Chemical Lace
User: [personal profile] chemicallace
Date: 2011-08-23 17:03 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

They turned off search? Oh no! It was so helpful for genealogical research.

Reply | Link